Effects of inorganic-organic fertilization schemes on the soil carbon fixation microbial communities and organic carbon accumulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25165/ijabe.v18i6.9970Keywords:
fertilization type, soil organic carbon, cbbLbacterial community, response relationship, carbon fixation functional genesAbstract
This study aimed to elucidate the effects of different fertilization on the accumulation of soil organic carbon (SOC) and the community structure of carbon fixation bacteria in farmland, as well as their carbon sink mechanisms. Four field-based treatments were set up: no fertilizer (CK), organic fertilizer (OF), inorganic fertilizer (CF), and organic-inorganic compound fertilizer (OCF). Differences in soil cbbL bacterial communities, SOC and its component contents, and carbon pool management indices were analyzed using methods such as NMDS, Anosim, and metagenomeSeq tests. The aim was to identify the key differential species under different fertilization treatments, analyze the response relationship between cbbL bacteria communities and SOC and its component content, and clarify the important carbon fixation functional genes. The main findings were as follows: 1) CF and OCF significantly reduced soil cbbL bacterial diversity (p<0.05). Significant differences were observed among cbbL bacterial communities under different fertilization treatments (p=0.001). CK and OF treatments had higher numbers of unique OTUs and similar species composition. The six bacterial orders with significant differences among different fertilization treatments predominantly belonged to Pseudomonadota and Actinomycetota. 2) The CF treatment had the lowest content of SOC and its components, and carbon pool management indices. OF and OCF were beneficial to the improvement of SOC and its components, but there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). Short-term fertilization differences had no significant effect on the carbon pool management index (p>0.05). 3) Compared with cbbL bacterial diversity, the differentially abundant species had a higher contribution to SOC accumulation (83.90%). Among them, Chromatiales significantly affected the active components of SOC and the carbon pool management index (p=0.04). Thiodictyon was a major functional genus under this order that had a significant positive effect on SOC (p=0.034), with the application of organic fertilizer exhibiting a targeted effect, promoting its abundance. The research results have revealed the key pathways for regulating microbial carbon fixation through fertilization, providing a novel theoretical basis and practical targets for carbon fixation and emission reduction in farmland ecosystems. Key words: fertilization type; soil organic carbon; cbbLbacterial community; response relationship; carbon fixation functional genes DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20251806.9970 Citation: Kong C C, Ye H C, Zhang S W, Wang S. Effects of inorganic-organic fertilization schemes on the soil carbon fixation microbial communities and organic carbon accumulation. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2025; 18(6): 158–167.References
Wu Y, Zhao P P, Lin K M, Zhou J C, Lv M K, Zhang Q F, et al. Elevation gradient characteristics and impact factors of soil carbon fractions inthe Pinus taiwanensis Hayata forests of Daiyun Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020; 40(16): 5761–5770. (in Chinese)
Cotrufo M F, Soong J L, Horton A J, Campbell E E, Haddix M L, Wall D H, et al. Formation of soil organic matter via biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss. Nature Geoscience, 2015; 8(10): 776–779.
Liang C, Schimel J P, Jastrow J D. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature Microbiology, 2017; 2(8): 17105.
Falkowski P, Scholes R J, Boyle E, Canadell J, Canfield D, Elser J, et al. The global carbon cycle: A test of our knowledge of Earth as a system. Science, 2000; 290(5490): 291–296.
Yao Y, Shen X L, Wang L L, Zhao J N, Gong L X, Wang S, et al. Effects of tillage management on cbbL-carrying bacteria and soil organic carbon dynamics across aggregate size classes in the farmland of north China plain. Ecological Indicators, 2023; 150: 110213.
Li N, Wang B R, Huang Y M, Huang Q, Jiao F, An S S. Response of cbbL-harboring microorganisms to precipitation changes in a naturally-restored grassland. Science of the Total Environment, 2022; 838: 156191.
Yuan H Z, Ge T D, Wu X H, Liu S L, Tong C L, Qin H L, et al. Long-term field fertilization alters the diversity of autotrophic bacteria based on the ribulose-1, 5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) large-subunit genes in paddy soil. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012; 95(4): 1061–1071.
Selesi D, Pattis I, Schmid M, Kandeler E, Hartmann A. Quantification of bacterial RubisCO genes in soils by cbbL targeted real-time PCR. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2007; 69(3): 497–503.
Fan K K, Delgado-baquerizo M, Guo X S, Wang D Z, Wu Y Y, Zhu M, et al. Suppressed N fixation and diazotrophs after four decades of fertilization. Microbiome, 2019; 7(1): 143.
Wei X M, Fan L C, Li Y H, Wang W H, Zhu Z K, Zhran M, et al. Subsurface methane dynamics of a paddy field under long-term fertilization: 13C-evidence from in-situ belowground labeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021; 325: 129285.
Guo Z C, Zhang Z B, Zhou H, Wang D Z, Peng X H. The effect of 34-year continuous fertilization on the SOC physical fractions and its chemical composition in a vertisol. Scientific Reports, 2019; 9(1): 2505.
Xu W Y, Zhao D F, Ma Y, Yang G T, Ambus P L, Liu X H, et al. Effects of long-term organic fertilizer substitutions on soil nitrous oxide emissions and nitrogen cycling gene abundance in a greenhouse vegetable field. Applied Soil Ecology, 2023; 188: 104877.
Qin H, Chen J H, Wu Q F, Niu L M, Li Y C, Liang C F, et al. Intensive management decreases soil aggregation and changes the abundance and community compositions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in moso bamboo (phyllostachys pubescens) forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017; 400: 246–255.
Leifeld J, Reiser R, Oberholzer H. Consequences of conventional versus organic farming on soil carbon: results from a 27‐year field experiment. Agronomy Journal, 2009; 101(5): 1204–1218.
Zhao K, Kong W D, Wang F, Long X E, Guo C Y, Yue L Y, et al. Desert and stepp.soils exhibit lower autotrophic microbial abundance but higher atmospheric CO2 fixation capacity than meadow soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2018; 127: 230–238.
Mattin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. Journal, 2011; 17(1): 10–12.
Callahan B J, Mcmurdie P J, Rosen M J, Han A W, Johnson A J A, Holmes S P. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods, 2016; 13(7): 581–583.
Bolyen E, Rideout J R, Dillon M R, Bokulich N A, Abnet C C, Al-ghalith, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nature Biotechnology, 2019; 37(8): 852–857.
Carter M R, Gregorich E G. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Second Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007; 1264 p.
De troyer I, Amery F, Van moorleghem C, Smolders E, Merckx R. Tracing the source and fate of dissolved organic matter in soil after incorporation of a 13C labelled residue: A batch incubation study. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2011; 43(3): 513–519.
Lin T T, Zheng J, Zhu G F, Luan L, Yang Y Y P, Liu J, et al. Effects of organic fertilization on bacterial community and maize productivity in drylan red soil. Environmental Science, 2023; 44(12): 6965–6972. (in Chinese)
Liu H M, Hai X, An K R, Zhang H F, Wang H, Zhang Y J, et al. Effects of different fertilization regimes on community structure diversity of CO2-assimilating bacteria in maize fieldof fluvo-aquic soil in North China. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022; 31(4): 715–722. (in Chinese)
Wei W, Xu Y L, Zhu L, Han X Z, Li S. Effect of long-term fertilization on soil microbial communities in farmland of black soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2013; 50(2): 372–380. (in Chinese)
Banerjee S, Schlaepp K, Van der heijden M G A. Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2018; 16(9): 567–576.
Hou J W, Xing J W, Yang L L, Wu C D, Zhao H, Duan Y, et al. Differences in soil fertility and bacterial community structure between carbon inputs such as biochar and organic fertilizer and their relationship. Environment Science, 2024; 45(7): 4218–4227. (in Chinese)
Yu G, Zhao S L, Feng S M, Sun Y B, Chen F. Effects of different fertilization treatments on bacterial community and citrus quality in yellow soils of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Environment Science, 2024; 45(12): 7337–7349. (in Chinese)
Blaise D, Velmourougane K, Santosh S, Manikandan A. Intercrop mulch affects soil biology and microbial diversity in rainfed transgenic Bt cotton hybrids. Science of the Total Environment, 2021; 794: 148787.
Javed Z, Tripathi G D, Mishra M, Dashora K. Actinomycetes-the microbial machinery for the organic-cycling, plant growth, and sustainable soil health. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 2021; 31: 101893.
Tian S Y, Zhu B J, Yin R, Wang M W, Jiang Y J, Zhang C Z, et al. Organic fertilization promotes crop productivity through changes in soil aggregation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022; 165: 108533.
Guo Z, Wang X L, Xu H, Duan J J, Zhang Y R, Li Y, et al. A large number of long-term application of organic fertilizer can effectively increase microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in yellow paddy soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017; 23(5): 1168–1174. (in Chinese)
Wei W L, Shi X J, Wang M X, Zhou Z F. Manure application maintained the CO2 fixation activity of soil autotrophic bacteria but changed its ecological characteristics in an entisol of China. Science of the Total Environment, 2024; 913: 169630.
Gregorich E G, Carter M R, Angers D A, Monreal C M, Ellert B H. Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1994; 74(4): 367–385.
Zheng Q, Hu Y T, Zhang S H, Noll L S, Böcklea T, Dietrich M, et al. Soil multifunctionality is affected by the soil environment and by microbial community composition and diversity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2019; 136: 107521.
Li J C, Gao M, Tian D, Huang R, Xu G X. Effects of straw and biochar on soil organic carbon and its active components. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018; 27(5): 39–50. (in Chinese)
Zhao Y, Guo X N, Luo J H, Chen X X, Ma Y. Soil organic carbon and carbon management index affected by the different fertilization methods in the field of irrigation silting soils. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016; 34(3): 16–22. (in Chinese)
Liao H, Qin F, Wang K, Zhang Y C, Hao X L, Chen W L, et al. Long-term chemical fertilization-driving changes in soil autotrophic microbial community depresses soil CO2 fixation in a Mollisol. Science of the Total Environment, 2020; 748: 141317.
Saini R, Kapoor R, Kumar R, Siddiqi T O, Kumar A. CO2 utilizing microbes—a comprehensive review. Biotechnology Advances, 2011; 29(6): 949–960.
Serrano W, Amann R, Rosselló-Móra R, Herbert R A, Fischer U. The genus allochromatium (chromatiales chromatiaceae) revisited: A study on its intragenic structure based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) and DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH). Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2011; 34(8): 590–594.
Zhu X F, Jackson R D, Delucia E H, Tiedje J M, Liang C. The soil microbial carbon pump: from conceptual insights to empirical assessments. Global Change Biology, 2020; 26(11): 6032–6039.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
IJABE is an international peer reviewed open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).