Full-condition monitoring and intelligent yield prediction and decision-making technology for wheat combine harvesters

Authors

  • Weipeng Zhang 1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China
  • Hongze Guo 1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China
  • Bo Zhao 1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China
  • Liming Zhou 1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China
  • Fengzhu Wang 1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China
  • Dongyang Wang 2. College of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • Yangchun Liu 1. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25165/ijabe.v%25vi%25i.8780

Keywords:

combine harvester, working condition monitoring, GPS, production forecast, intelligent decision-making

Abstract

Against the backdrop of precision agriculture and the development of intelligent agricultural machinery, current domestic monitoring systems for wheat combine harvesters are plagued by limited functionality, low intelligence, significant errors in parameter monitoring, and yield estimation results prone to inaccuracies. Specifically, they lag behind mature international systems in terms of fault warning accuracy, data transmission efficiency, and yield visualization capabilities. This study seeks to realize comprehensive and precise monitoring, reliable fault early warning, and intelligent yield prediction for wheat combine harvesters across all operating conditions. To this end, it innovatively adopts CAN bus integration technology and impulse-type grain flow sensors to develop a comprehensive system for monitoring the operational status and warning faults of wheat combine harvesters, which covers the entire operational process. By integrating GPS positioning, multi-sensor parameter acquisition, and intelligent analysis modules through CAN bus integration, the system enables unified monitoring of geographic information, operational data, cleaning loss, and fault of status. Additionally, it incorporates a yield measurement module based on an impulse-type grain flow sensor to generate the real-time yield distribution maps. Field experiments demonstrate that the system achieves an alarm accuracy of 97.3%, controls the fuel consumption measurement error within 5%, and limits the relative error of yield measurement accuracy to no more than 4%. Notably, the impulse-type grain flow sensor exhibits stable static detection accuracy and rapid, precise dynamic measurement performance—laying a solid foundation for the automation and intelligent advancement of combine harvester technologies. Key words: combine harvester; working condition monitoring; GPS; production forecast; intelligent decision-making DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20251806.8780 Citation: Zhang W P, Guo H Z, Zhao B, Zhou L M, Wang F Z, Wang D Y, et al. Full-condition monitoring and intelligent yield prediction and decision-making technology for wheat combine harvesters. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2025; 18(6): 202–211.

References

Zhang Y, Yin Y, Meng Z, Chen D, Qin W, Wang Q, Dai D. Development and testing of a grain combine harvester throughput monitoring system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022; 200: 107253.

Vakhrushev V V, Nemtsev A E, Ivanov N M. Evaluation of the main indicators of the reliability of the power transmission of a combine harvester John Deere 9660. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020; 941(1): 012068.

Bai X, Chen Q, Song X, Hong W. Advancing agricultural machinery maintenance: Deep learning-enabled motor fault diagnosis. IEEE Access, 2025; 13: 129933–129951,

Zhang W, Zhao B, Zhou L, Wang J, Niu K, Wang F, et al. Research on comprehensive operation and maintenance based on the fault diagnosis system of combine harvester. Agriculture, 2022; 12(6): 893.

Qiu Z, Shi G, Zhao B, Jin X, Zhou L. Combine harvester remote monitoring system based on multi-source information fusion. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022; 194: 106771.

Fei S, Hassan M A, Xiao Y, Su X, Chen Z, Cheng Q, et al. UAV-based multi-sensor data fusion and machine learning algorithm for yield prediction in wheat. Precision Agriculture, 2023; 24(1): 187–212.

Zhu H, Liang S, Lin C, He Y, Xu J L. Using multi-sensor data fusion techniques and machine learning algorithms for improving UAV-based yield prediction of oilseed rape. Drones, 2024; 8(11): 642.

Belay M A, Blakseth S S, Rasheed A, Rossi P S. Unsupervised anomaly detection for IoT-based multivariate time series: Existing solutions, performance analysis and future directions. Sensors, 2023; 23(5): 2844.

Sinha B B, Dhanalakshmi R. Recent advancements and challenges of internet of things in smart agriculture: a survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2022; 126: 169–184.

Almufareh M F, Humayun M, Ahmad Z, Khan A. An intelligent LoRaWAN-based IoT device for monitoring and control solutions in smart farming through anomaly detection integrated with unsupervised machine learning. IEEE Access, 2024; 12: 119072–119086.

Zou X, Liu W, Huo Z, Wang S, Chen Z, Xin C, et al. Current status and prospects of research on sensor fault diagnosis of agricultural internet of things. Sensors, 2023; 23(5): 2528.

Zhang X, Rane K P, Kakaravada I, Shabaz M. Research on vibration monitoring and fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on internet of things technology. Nonlinear Engineering, 2021; 10(1): 245–254.

Choe H O, Lee M H. Artificial intelligence-based fault diagnosis and prediction for smart farm information and communication technology equipment. Agriculture, 2023; 13(11): 2124.

Yuan X, He Y, Wan S, Qiu M, Jiang H. Remote vibration monitoring and fault diagnosis system of synchronous motor based on internet of things technology. Mobile Information Systems, 2021; 2021(1): 3456624.

Chen M, Jin C, Ni Y, Yang T, Zhang G. Online field performance evaluation system of a grain combine harvester. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022; 198: 107047.

Mohammad Hosseinpour-Zarnaq, Mahmoud Omid, Ebrahim Biabani-Aghdam. Fault diagnosis of tractor auxiliary gearbox using vibration analysis and random forest classifier. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2022; 9(1): 60–67.

Mejbel B G, Sarow S A, Al-Sharify M T, AI-Haddad L A, Ogaili A A F, AI-Sharify Z T. A data fusion analysis and random forest learning for enhanced control and failure diagnosis in rotating machinery. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2024; 24(6): 2979–2989.

Yılmaz D, Gökduman M E. Development of a measurement system for noise and vibration of combine harvester. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(6): 104–108.

Song Y, Zhang X, Wang W. Rollover dynamics modelling and analysis of self-propelled combine harvester. Biosystems Engineering, 2021; 209: 271–281.

Badihi H, Zhang Y, Jiang B, Pillay P, Rakheja S. A comprehensive review on signal-based and model-based condition monitoring of wind turbines: Fault diagnosis and lifetime prognosis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2022; 110(6): 754–806.

Che Y, Zheng G, Li Y, Hui X, Li Y. Unmanned agricultural machine operation system in farmland based on improved fuzzy adaptive priority-driven control algorithm. Electronics, 2024; 13(20): 4141.

Mikram M, Moujahdi C, Rhanoui M. Deep learning and machine learning approaches for data-driven risk management and decision support in precision agriculture. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 2025; 11(2): 226–247.

Younas M, Akhtar M N, Batool S, Owais M, Sahar S, Anum W. The integration of artificial intelligence in agriculture: Emerging trends, benefits and challenges. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 2025; 14(1): 1316–1333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.1.105.

Bala A, Rashid R Z J A, Ismail I, Oliva D, Muhammad N, Sait S M, et al. Artificial intelligence and edge computing for machine maintenance-review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2024; 57(5): 119.

Li H, Gao F, Zuo G C. Research on the agricultural machinery path tracking method based on deep reinforcement learning. Scientific Programming, 2022; 2022(1): 6385972.

Singh A K, Junior F N F, Mainsah N L, Abdoul-Rahmane B. Enabling data collection and analysis for precision agriculture in smart farms. IEEE Transactions on AgriFood Electronics, 2024; 3(1): 69–85.

Wang H, Lao L, Zhang H, Tang Z, Qian P, He Q. Structural fault detection and diagnosis for combine harvesters: A critical review. Sensors, 2025; 25(13): 3851.

Xu S, Wang H, Liang X, Lu H. Research progress on methods for improving the stability of non-destructive testing of agricultural product quality. Foods, 2024; 13(23): 3917.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Zhang, W., Guo, H., Zhao, B., Zhou, L., Wang, F., Wang, D., & Liu, Y. (2025). Full-condition monitoring and intelligent yield prediction and decision-making technology for wheat combine harvesters. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 18(6), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.25165/ijabe.v%vi%i.8780

Issue

Section

Information Technology, Sensors and Control Systems