Droplets deposition and harvest-aid efficacy for UAV application in arid cotton areas in Xinjiang, China

Guobin Wang, Jiahui Wang, Pengchao Chen, Xiaoqiang Han, Shengde Chen, Yubin Lan

Abstract


With the development of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) sprayers, the application of low-volume spraying of harvest-aid and other agrochemicals to cotton using UAVs is becoming a new agronomic trend worldwide. The effect of spray volume and canopy density for UAV spraying is significant but was rarely studied. In this study, five representative spray volumes were explored to examine the effect of spray volume on deposition and harvest-aid efficacy for cotton using a UAV sprayer. To explore the effect of canopy density, similar tests were carried out in a field located nearby with a lower leaf area index (LAI). A conventional trailer boom sprayer was selected for comparison. Different spray volumes had a significant effect on defoliation, but had no significant effect on boll opening and fiber quality. A higher defoliation rate was achieved in the lower LAI field. The total rate of defoliation using the UAV was inferior to the boom sprayer in the high LAI field for lower deposition and defoliation rate in the lower canopy. Considering the deposition, defoliation rate, and working efficiency, a spray volume of 15.0 L/hm2 with an average droplet size of 150 μm is recommended for UAV application.
Keywords: UAV, droplets deposition, spray volume, canopy density, leaf area index, defoliation, boll opening rate
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20221505.6425

Citation: Wang G B, Wang J H, Chen P C, Han X Q, Chen S D, Lan Y B. Droplets deposition and harvest-aid efficacy for UAV application in arid cotton areas in Xinjiang, China. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(5): 9–18.

Keywords


UAV, droplets deposition, spray volume, canopy density, leaf area index, defoliation, boll opening rate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sunilkumar G, Campbell L M, Puckhaber L, Stipanovic R D, Rathore K S. Engineering cottonseed for use in human nutrition by tissue-specific reduction of toxic gossypol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006; 103: 18054–18059.

Du M W, Ren X M, Tian X L, Duan L S, Zhang M C, Tan W M, et al. Evaluation of harvest aid chemicals for the cotton-winter wheat double cropping system. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013; 12(2): 273–282.

Wright S D, Hutmacher R B, Banuelos G, Rios S I, Hutmacher K A, Munk D S, et al. Impact of pima defoliation timings on lint yield and quality. Journal of Cotton Science, 2014; 18 (1): 48–58.

Qin W C, Xue X Y, Cui L F, Zhou Q Q, Xu Z F, Chang F L. Optimization and test for spraying parameters of cotton defoliant sprayer. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9(4): 63–72.

Dodds D M, Fromme D, Sandlin T, Raper T B, Robertson B. 2019 Mid-South cotton defoliation guide. MidSouth Cotton Specialists’ Working Group, 2019; 12p.

Williamson J, Neilsen W. The influence of forest site on rate and extent of soil compaction and profile disturbance of skid trails during ground-based harvesting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2000; 30(8): 1196–1205.

Wang G B, Han Y X, Li X, Andaloro J, Chen P C, Hoffmann W, et al. Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer. Science of the Total Environment, 2020; 737: 139793. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139793.

Lan Y, Chen S. Current status and trends of plant protection UAV and its spraying technology in China. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018; 1: 1–9.

Jenkins D, Vasigh D B. The economic impact of unmanned aircraft systems integration in the United States. Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, Retrieved February, 2013; pp.2–38.

Faiçal B S, Costa F G, Pessin G, Ueyama J, Freitas H, Colombo A, et al. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles and wireless sensor networks for spraying pesticides. Journal of Systems Architecture, 2014; 60: 393–404.

Faiçal B S, Freitas H, Gomes P H, Mano L Y, Pessin G, Carvalho A C d, et al. An adaptive approach for UAV-based pesticide spraying in dynamic environments. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017; 138: 210–223.

Berner B, Pachuta A, Chojnacki J. Estimation of liquid deposition on corn plants sprayed from a drone. Czech Republic, 2018; 7–8.

Wang G B, Lan Y B, Yuan H Z, Qi H X, Chen P C, Ouyang F, et al. Comparison of spray deposition, control efficacy on wheat aphids and working efficiency in the wheat field of the unmanned aerial vehicle with boom sprayer and two conventional knapsack sprayers. Applied Science, 2019; 9(2): 218. doi: 10.3390/app9020218.

Qin W C, Qiu B J, Xue X Y, Chen C, Xu Z F, Zhou QQ. Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers. Crop Protection, 2019; 85: 79–88.

Wen S, Lan Y B, Zhang J T, Li S H, Zhang H Y, Xing H. Analysis and experiment on atomization characteristics of ultra-low-volume swirl nozzle for agricultural unmanned aviation vehicle. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016; 32(20): 85–93. (in Chinese)

Zhou Q Q, Xue X Y, Qin W C, Cai C, Zhou L F. Optimization and test for structural parameters of UAV spraying rotary cup atomizer. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(3): 78–86.

Zhu H, Li H, Huang Y, Yu H, Dong Y, Li J. Effects of technical operation parameters on spray characteristics of rotor plant protection UAV. Smart Agriculture, 2019; 1(3): 113–122. (in Chinese)

Chen S D, Lan Y B, Li J Y, Zhou Z Y, Jin J, Liu A M. Effect of spray parameters of small unmanned helicopter on distribution regularity of droplet deposition in hybrid rice canopy. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016; 32(17): 40–46. (in Chinese)

Meng Y H, Lan Y B, Mei G Y, Guo Y W, Song J L, Wang Z G. Effect of aerial spray adjuvant applying on the efficiency of small unmanned aerial vehicle on wheat aphids control. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(5): 46–53.

Qin W C, Xue X Y, Zhou L X, Zhang S C, Sun Z, Kong W, et al. Effects of spraying parameters of unmanned aerial vehicle on droplets deposition distribution of maize canopies. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(5): 50–56. (in Chinese)

Li X, Giles D K, Niederholzer F J, Andaloro J T, Lang E B, Watson L J. Evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle as a new method of pesticide application for almond crop protection. Pest Management Science, 2021; 77(1): 527–537.

Zheng Y Q, Xie R J, Lyu Q, Yi S L, He S L. Droplet distribution and control against citrus leafminer with UAV spraying. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2017; 32(3): 299–307.

Martin D E, Woldt W E, Latheef M A. Effect of application height and ground speed on spray pattern and droplet spectra from remotely piloted aerial application systems. Drones, 2019; 3(4): 83.

Richardson B, Rolando C A, Somchit C, Dunker C, Strand T M, Kimberley M O. Swath pattern analysis from a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle configured for pesticide application. Pest Management Science, 2020; 76(4): 1282–1290.

Wang G B, Lan Y B, Qi H X, Chen P C, Hewitt A, Han Y X. Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer: effect of spray volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat. Pest Management Science, 2019; 75(6): 1546–1555.

Wang G B, Li X, Andaloro J T, Chen P C, Song C C, Shan C F, et al. Deposition and biological efficacy of UAV-based low-volume application in rice fields. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018; 1(1): 65–72.

Xue X Y, Kang T, Qin W C, Lan Y B, Zhang H. Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2014; 7(4): 23–28.

Wang J, Lan Y B, Zhang H H, Zhang Y L, Wen S, Yao W X, et al. Drift and deposition of pesticide applied by UAV on pineapple plants under different meteorological conditions. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(6): 5–12.

Wang C L, Herbst A, Zeng A J, Wongsuk S, Qiao B Y, Qi P, et al. Assessment of spray deposition, drift and mass balance from unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer using an artificial vineyard. Science of the Total Environment, 2021; 777: 146181. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146181.

Zhu H, Salyani M, Fox R D. A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2011; 76: 38–43.

Dodds D M, Fromme D, Sandlin T, Raper T B, Robertson B. 2018 Mid-South cotton defoliation guide. MidSouth Cotton Specialists’ Working Group, 12p.

Woods N, Craig I P, Dorr G, Young B. Spray drift of pesticides arising from aerial application in cotton. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2001; 30(3): 697–701.

Warrick B E. Six year summary of harvest aid testing in the southern rolling plains of Texas. Proceedings, 1998; 2: 1410–1413.

Siebert J D, Stewart A M, Miller D K, Craig C C. Effect of carrier volume and nozzle type on cotton harvest-aid efficacy. Journal of Cotton Science, 2006; 10: 89–96.

Knoche M. Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides. Crop Protection, 1994; 13: 163–178.

Tian J S, Zhang X Y, Yang Y L, Yang C C, Xu S Z, Zuo W Q, et al. How to reduce cotton fiber damage in the Xinjiang China. Industrial Crops and Products, 2017; 109: 803–811.

Chen S D, Lan Y B, Li J Y, Zhou Z Y, Liu A M, Mao Y D. Effect of wind field below unmanned helicopter on droplet deposition distribution of aerial spraying. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(3): 67–77.

Watson D J. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops: I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Annals of Botany, 1947; 11: 41–76.

Gil E, Llorens J, Landers A, Llop J, Giralt L. Field validation of dosavina, a decision support system to determine the optimal volume rate for pesticide application in vineyards. European Journal of Agronomy, 2011; 35(1): 33–46.

Yang S H, Zheng Y J, Liu X X. Research status and trends of downwash airflow of spray UAVs in agriculture. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2019; 2(1): 1–8.

Dammer K H, Wollny J, Giebel A. Estimation of the leaf area index in cereal crops for variable rate fungicide spraying. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008; 28: 351–360.

Bednarz C W, Bridges D C, Brown S M. Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities. Agronomy Journal, 2000; 92: 128–135.

Bednarz C W, Shurley W D, Anthony W S, Nichols R L. Yield, quality, and profitability of cotton produced at varying plant densities. Agronomy Journal, 2005; 97: 235–240.

Zhao D, Reddy K R, Kakani V G, Read J J, Koti S. Canopy reflectance in cotton for growth assessment and lint yield prediction. European Journal of Agronomy, 2007; 26: 335–344.

Echer F R, Rosolem C A. Cotton yield and fiber quality affected by row spacing and shading at different growth stages. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015; 65: 18–26.




Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office