Range formula based on angle of dispersion and nozzle configuration from an impact sprinkler

Yue Jiang, Zakaria Issaka, Hong Li, Pan Tang, Chao Chen

Abstract


Jet breakup and dispersion from impact sprinkler are mainly influenced by the configurations of nozzle and dispersion device. Based on the structure, different types of nozzles were designed and tested with a pointed tip dispersion device under low pressure conditions. Experiments were performed using High-Speed Photographic technique, and Matlab computation program was established and applied to determine the initial jet breakup length and angle of dispersion from the nozzles. The sprinkler range decreased with the increase in diameter of nozzle, and the largest range of 15.1 m was produced from sprinkler with 6 mm nozzle size under a pressure of 150 kPa. The angle of dispersion decreased with the increase of jet velocity, the spray coverage from sprinkler with 6 mm nozzle size was 1478 mm under 150 kPa, and was not statistically different when the pressure was increased. A new range formula was established for sprinkler with dispersion device through curve fitting of the parameters of initial jet breakup length, angle of dispersion, nozzle size and working pressure. The new formula was reliable for calculating range with a relative error less than 3%. Since the formula is based on the angle of dispersion, it could be useful to estimate uniformity of water distribution in sprinkler irrigated fields.
Keywords: fixed dispersion device, range, jet breakup, angle of dispersion, spray coverage, impact sprinkler
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191205.4646

Citation: Jiang Y, Issaka Z, Li H, Tang P, Chen C. Range formula based on angle of dispersion and nozzle configuration from an impact sprinkler. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(5): 97–105.

Keywords


fixed dispersion device, range, jet breakup, angle of dispersion, spray coverage, impact sprinkler

Full Text:

PDF

References


Liljedahl L A. Effect of fluid properties and nozzle parameters on drop size distribution from fan spray nozzles. Iowa State University, Michigan, USA, 1971.

Seginer I, Kantz D, Nir D. The distortion by wind of the distribution patterns of single sprinklers. Agricultural Water Management, 1991; 19:341–359.

Han S, Evans R G, Kroeger M W. Sprinkler distribution patterns in windy conditions. Transactions of the ASAE, 1994; 37(5): 1481–1489.

Li J, Kawano H. Simulating water-drop movement from noncircular sprinkler nozzles. Journal of Irrigation Drainage Engineering, 1995; 121(2): 152–158.

Jiang Y, Li H, Chen C, Xiang Q J. Calculation and verification of formula for the range of sprinklers based on jet breakup length. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(1): 49–57.

Yoon S S. Droplet distribution at the liquid core of a turbulent spray. Physics of Fluids, 2005; 17(3): 035103.

Viswanathan S, Lim D S, Madhumita B R. Measurements of drop size and distribution in an annular two-phase, Two-component flow occurring in a Venturi Scrubber. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005; 44(19): 7458–7468.

Lehrsch G A, Gallian J J. Oilseed radish effects on soil structure and soil water relations. Journal of Sugar Beet Residue, 2910; 47(2): 1–21.

Li J, Kawano H, Yu K. Droplet size distribution from the different shaped sprinkler nozzle. Transactions of the ASAE, 1994; 37: 1871–1878.

Bedaiwy M N A. Mechanical and hydraulic resistance relations in crust-topped soils. Catena, 2008; 72(2): 270–281.

Taheri M, Sheih C M. Mathematical modelling of atomizing scrubbers. AIChE Journal, 1975; 21(1): 153–157.

Fathikalajahi J, Talaie R, Taheri M. Theoretical study of liquid droplet dispersion in a Venturi scrubber. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1995; 45: 181–185.

Fathikalajahi J, Talaie M R, Taheri M. Theoretical study of non-uniform droplet concentration distribution on venturi scrubber performance. Particulate Science and Technology, 1996; 14: 153–164.

Gonçalves J A S, Costa M A M, Henrique P R, Coury J R. Atomization of liquids in a Pease-Anthony venturi scrubber: Part I. Jet dynamics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003; 97: 267–279.

Lefebvre A H. Atomization and sprays. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, USA, 1989.

Ohrn T R, Senser D W, Lefebvre A H. Geometric effects on spray cone angle for plain nozzle atomizers. Atomization and Sprays, 1991; 1(3): 253–268.

Chen S K, Lefebvre A H. Spray cone angles of effervescent atomizers. Atomization and Sprays, 1994; 4(3): 291–301.

Ruiz F, Chigier N. Parametric experiments on liquid jet atomization spray angle. Atomization and Sprays, 1991; 1(1): 23–45.

Abramovich G N. Theory of turbulent jets. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, UK, 1963.

Yokota, K.; Matsuoka, S. An experimental study of fuel spray in a diesel engine. Transactions of the Japanese Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1977; 43: 3455–3464.

Reitz R D, Bracco F V. On the dependence of spray angle and other spray parameters on nozzle design and operating conditions. SAE Paper No.790494, 1979.

Viswanathan S, Pierre St C, Gnyp A W. Jet penetration measurements in a Venturi scrubber. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1983; 61: 504–508.

Fathikalajahi J, Talaie M R, Taheri M. Theoretical study of liquid droplet dispersion in a Venturi scrubber. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1995; 45: 181–185.

Gonçalves J A S, Costa M A M, Henrique P R, Coury J R. Atomization of liquids in a Pease-Anthony Venturi scrubber: Part I. Jet dynamics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003; 97: 267–279.

Hsiang L, Faeth G. Near-limit drop deformation and secondary breakup. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1992; 18: 635–652.

Kotsovinos N E. A note on the spreading rate and virtual origin of a plane turbulent jet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1976; 77: 305–311.

Varde K S, Popa D M, Varde L K. Spray angle and atomization in diesel sprays. SAE Paper No.841055, 1984.

American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. ASABE Standards (R2007). S398.1: Procedure for sprinkler testing and performance reporting. St Joseph, Mich., MI. USA, 2007.

Li J, Kawano H, Yu K. Droplet size distribution from the different shaped sprinkler nozzle. Transactions of the ASAE, 1994; 37: 1871–1878.

Zhu X Y, Yuan S Q, Liu J P. Effect of sprinkler head geometrical parameters on hydraulic performance of fluidic sprinkler. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE, 2012; 138(11): 1019–1026.

Gregory C T, Alarecon J J. Rotary sprinkler nozzle for enhancing close-in water distribution. U.S. Patent No. 7325753B2, 2008.

ISO 7749-1:1995. Agricultural irrigation equipment-Rotating sprinklers. 1995.

Li J S. Sprinkler performance as function of nozzle geometrical parameters. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-ASCE, 1996; 122(4): 244–247.

Jiang Y, Chen C, Li H, Xiang Q J. Influences of nozzle parameters and low-pressure on jet breakup and droplet characteristics. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9(4): 22–32.

Chillman A, Ramulu M, Hashish M. Waterjet and water-air jet surface processing of titanium alloy: a parametric evaluation. Journal of Manufacturing Science Engineering, 2010; 132(1): 011012.

Kohnen B T, Musemic E, Straburger F, Kupper B, Walzel P. Measurement of the droplet size distribution of a full cone nozzle. 23rd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray System, Brno, Czech Republic, 2010; pp.22–32.

Hamid A H A, Atan R L, Noh M H M, Rashid H. Spray cone angle and air core diameter of hollow cone swirl rocket injector. IIUM Engineering Journal, Special Issue on Mechanical Engineering, 2011; 12: 1–9.

Hsiang L, Faeth G. Near-limit drop deformation and secondary breakup. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1992; 18: 635–652.




Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office