Improved greenhouse cucumber production under deficit water and fertilization in Northern China

Shaikh Abdullah Al Mamun Hossain, Lixue Wang, Haisheng Liu

Abstract


The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different water and fertilizer applications on biomass, yield and fruit physical quality of greenhouse cucumber under drip irrigation. The experiment was conducted at Water Conservancy Research Institute, Shenbei District, Shenyang, Northern China during February-July, 2016. Nine treatments were used in randomized block design consisted of three levels of water field capacity (FC) and urea-potash (N-K) fertilizer combinations: W1 (65% of FC), W2 (75% of FC), W3 (85% of FC) and N1-K1 (285-305 kg/hm2), N2-K2 (420-435 kg/hm2), N3-K3 (530-565 kg/hm2). Local farmers’ conventional application of water (100%) and fertilizer (NPK) was considered as check (CK) for comparison. Data obtained was analyzed (ANOVA) to check the significant effect of treatments. The results revealed that, treatment W3N2K1 obtained highest cucumber yield of 129.99 t/hm2, while W1N1K1 recorded the lowest yield (113.29 t/hm2), in which total amount of seasonal water applied ranges from 85.3 mm to 172.36 mm. The highest yield was obtained 0.5% greater than the CK yield (129.35 t/hm2). The water and fertilizer application was significantly (p<0.001) influenced on cucumber yield. Moreover, the influence of water application was significantly (0.01


Keywords


cucumber, drip irrigation, fertilizer, greenhouse, yield

Full Text:

PDF

References


Howell T A. Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agronomy journal, 2001; 93: 281–289.

Phuntsho S, Shon H K, Hong S, Lee S, Vigneswaran S. A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: Evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011; 375 (1-2): 172–181.

Krüger E, Schmidt G, Brücker U. Scheduling strawberry irrigation based upon tensiometer measurement and a climatic water balance model. Scientia Horticulturae, 1999; 81(4): 409–424.

Martinez L, Thornsbury S, Nagai T. National and international factors in pickle markets. Agricultural Economics Report No. 628, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, Oct 2006; 1–20.

Chen J, Kang S, Du T, Qiu R, Guo P, Chen R. Quantitative response of greenhouse tomato yield and quality to water deficit at different growth stages. Agricultural Water Management, 2013; 129: 152–162.

Li J, Zhang J, Ren L. Water and nitrogen distribution as affected by fertigation of ammonium nitrate from a point source. Irrigation Science, 2003; 22(1): 19–30.

Wang Z, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Liu X. Subsurface drip irrigation scheduling for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in solar greenhouse based on 20 cm standard pan evaporation in Northeast China. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009; 123(1): 51–57.

Wang X K, Xing Y Y. Evaluation of the effect of irrigation and fertilization by drip fertigation on tomato yield and water use efficiency in greenhouse. International Journal of Agronomy, 2016; 1–10.

Ayas S, Demirtaş Ç. Deficit irrigation effects on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. Maraton) yield in unheated greenhouse condition. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 2009; 7 (3-4): 645–649.

Yaghi T, Arslana A, Naoum F. Cucumber (Cucumis sativus, L.) water use efficiency (WUE) under plastic mulch and drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 2013; 128: 149–157.

Ertek A, Sensoy S, Gedik I, Küçükyumuk C. Irrigation scheduling based on pan evaporation values for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under field conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 2006; 81: 159–172.

Hamza A A, Almasraf S A. Evaluation of the yield and water use efficiency of the cucumber inside greenhouses. J. of Babylon University Engineering Science, 2016; 24 (1): 95–106.

Alomran A M, Louki I I. Yield response of cucumber to deficit irrigation in greenhouses. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Conference paper, Water Resources Management, 2011; 145(VI): 17–524.

Buttaro D, Santamaria P, Signore A, Cantore V, Boari F, Montesano F F, et al. Irrigation management of greenhouse tomato and cucumber using tensiometer: Effects on yield, quality and water use. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2015; 4: 440–444.

Zhang H, Chi D, Wang Q, Fang J, Fang X. Yield and quality response of cucumber to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization under subsurface drip irrigation in solar greenhouse. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2011; 10(6): 921–930.

Arshad I, Ali W, Khan Z A. Effect of different levels of npk fertilizers on the growth and yield of greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis Sativus) by using drip irrigation technology. International Journal of Research, 2014; 1(8): 650–660.

Qi P S, Yong C, Tao L. Micro irrigation fertilizer application manuals for farmers. Edited by Qing H Z. Zhong Duo Agricultural Press. China, 2008; 42–49. (Chinese).

Zotarelli L, Scholberg J M, Dukes M D, Muñoz-Carpena R, Icerman J. Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. Agricultural Water Management, 2009; 96(1): 23–34.

Nong W Z, Nong L Y, Yi M X, Jie M Y, Wen W E, Xia W M, et al. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. China Agricultural Press. 2nd Edition. China, 2009. (Chinese).

Israelsan O W, Hansen V E. Irrigation principles and practices, 3rd Ed. John Wily and Sons. New York, 1979.

Mamun Hossain S A A, Wang L, Chen T, Li, Z. Leaf area index assessment for tomato and cucumber growing period under water treatments. J. of Plant, Soil and Environment, 2017; 63 (10): 461–467.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). Crop water requirements. In: Irrigation and Drainage, Paper No. 24. FAO, Rome, Italy, 1982.

Lovelli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Tommaso T D. Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agricultural Water Management, 2007; 92: 73–80.

Doorenbos J, Kassam A H. Yield response factor to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper no. 33. Rome, Italy, 1979.

Steduto P, Hsiao T C, Fereres E, Raes D. 2012. Crop yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper No. 66. Rome, Italy, 2012.

Tafteh A, Babazadeh H, EbrahimiPak N A, Kaveh F. Evaluation and Improvement of Crop Production Functions for Simulation Winter Wheat Yields with Two Types of Yield Response Factors. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2013; 5(3): 111–122.

Beyaert R P, Roy R C, Ball-Coelh B R. Irrigation and fertilizer management effects on processing cucumber productivity and water use efficiency. Can. J. Plant Sci., 2006; 87: 355–363.

Ghehsareh A M, Hematian M, Kalbasi M. Comparison of date-palm wastes and perlite as culture substrates on growing indices in greenhouse cucumber. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agricult., 2012; 1: 1–5.

Alomran A M, Louki I I, Aly A A, Nadeem M E. Impact of deficit irrigation on soil salinity and cucumber yield under greenhouse condition in an arid environment. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 2013; 15: 1247–1259.

Hakim V M A, Chand A R J. Effect of drip irrigation levels on yield of salad cucumber under naturally ventilated polyhouse. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 2014; 4(4): 18–21.

Moutonnet P. Yield Response to field crops to deficit irrigation. In: "Deficit Irrigation Practices", (Eds.): Kirda C, Moutonnet P, Hera C, Nielsen D R. Water Report No.22, FAO, Rome, 2000; pp.11–16.

Amer K H, Midan S A, Hatfield J L. Effect of deficit irrigation and fertilization on cucumber. Agronomy Journal, 2009; 101(6): 1556–1564.




Copyright (c) 2018



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office