Effects of fan speed on spray deposition and drift for targeting air-assisted sprayer in pear orchard

Qiu Wei, Zhao Sanqin, Ding Weimin, Sun Chengda, Lu Jiang, Li Yinian, Gu Jiabing

Abstract


In order to reduce the application dosage of pesticides, a targeting air-assisted (TAA) sprayer was developed and tested in this study. Fruit trees were assayed by an infrared detection system to determine if the canopy needs to be sprayed. This TAA sprayer was compared with conventional air-assisted (CAA) sprayers, and the impacts of various fan speeds (0, 800 r/min, 1300 r/min, and 1800 r/min) on spray deposition, coverage, and drift amount were tested. Ponceau 2R was used as tracer to measure spray deposition under each treatment. Droplet coverage and canopy deposition were best when the CAA application fan speed was increased to 1300 r/min, but at higher fan speeds, spray deposition and coverage in canopy did not increase because extra air flow blew droplets from the ground into the air. During TAA spraying, droplet sizes increased at opening and closing moments. Optimal spray effects were achieved when the auxiliary airflow velocity was increased at a fan speed of 1800 r/min. The research provides a useful reference for the design of TAA and parameters optimization method with respect to the relationship between droplets deposition into tree canopy, ground and drift in the air.
Keywords: sprayers, infrared detectors, spray deposition, drift, fruit trees, plant protection
DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20160904.1938

Citation: Qiu W, Zhao S Q, Ding W M, Sun C D, Lu J, Li Y N, et al. Effects of fan speed on spray deposition and drift for targeting air-assisted sprayer in pear orchard. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9(4): 53－62.

Keywords


sprayers, infrared detectors, spray deposition, drift, fruit trees, plant protection

Full Text:

PDF

References


Travis J W, Skroch W A, Sutton T B. Effects of travel speed, application volume, and nozzle arrangement on deposition of pesticides in apple trees. Plant Dis., 1987; 71(7): 606–612.

Salyani M. Optimization of deposition efficiency for airblast sprayers. Trans. ASAE, 2000; 2(1): 121–126.

Derksen R C, Krause C R, Fox R D, Brazee R D. Spray delivery to nursery trees by air curtain and axial fan orchard sprayers. J. Environ. Hortic., 2004; 22(1): 17–22.

Gil Y, Sinfortc C. Emission of pesticides to the air during sprayer application: A bibliographic review, Atmos. Environ., 2005; 39(28): 5183–5193.

Derksen R C, Krause C R, Fox R D, Brazee R D, Randy Z. Effect of application variables on spray deposition, coverage, and ground losses in nursery tree applications. J. Environ. Hort., 2006; 24(1): 45–52.

Sumner H R, Herzog G A, Sumner P E, Bader M, Mullinix B G. Chemical application equipment for improved deposition in cotton. J. Cotton Sci., 2000; 4(1): 19–27.

Walklate P J, Cross J V, Richardson G M, Baker D E, Murray R A. A generic method of pesticide dose expression: Application to broadcast spraying of apple trees. Ann. appl. Biol., 2003; 143(1): 11–23.

Walklate P J, Cross J V, Richardson G M, Murray R A, Baker D E. Comparison of different spray volume deposition models using LIDAR measurements of apple orchards. Biosyst. Eng., 2002; 82(3): 253–267.

Gu J B, Zhu H, Ding W M, Jeon H Y. Dropet size distributions of adjuvant-amended sprays from an air-assisted five-port PWM nozzle. Atomization & Sprays, 2011; 21(3): 263–274.

Solanelles F, Escolà A, Planas S, Rosell J R, Camp F, Gràcia F. An electronic control system for pesticide application proportional to the canopy width of tree crops. Biosyst. Eng., 2006; 95(4): 473–481.

Chen Y. Development of an intelligent sprayer to optimize pesticide application in nurseries and orchards. PhD dissertation. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2010, 203p.

Lloren J, Giles E, Llop J, Escola A. Viable rate dosing in precision viticulture: Use of electronic device to improve application efficiency. Crop prot., 2010; 29(3): 239–248.

Hočevar M, Širok B, Jejčič V, Godeša T, Lešnik M, Stajnko D. Design and testing of an automated system for targeted spraying in orchards. J. Plant Dis. Prot., 2010; 117(2): 71–79.

Zhai C Y, Wang X, Zhao C J, Zou W, Liu D Y, Mao Y J. Orchard tree structure digital test system and its application. Math. Comp. Mod., 2011; 54(3-4): 1145–1150.

Herrington P J, Mapother H R, Stringer A. Spray retention and distribution on apple trees. Pestic. Sci., 1981(5); 12: 515–520.

Holownicki R, Doruchowski G, Godyn A, Swiechowski W. Variation of spray deposit and loss with air-jet directions applied in orchards. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 2000; 77(2): 129–136.

Zhu H, Brazee R D, Reichard D L, Fox R D, Krause C R, Chapple A C. Fluid velocity and shear in elliptic-orifice spray nozzles. Atomization & Sprays, 1995; 5(3): 343–356.

Tanaka T, Yamaguchi J, Takeda Y. Measurement of forest canopy structure with a laser plane range-finding method - development of a measurement system and applications to real forests. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1998; 91(3-4): 149–160.

Zaman Q U, Salyani M. Effects of foliage density and ground speed on ultrasonic measurement of citrus tree volume. Appl. Eng. Agric., 2004; 20(2): 173–178.

Jeon H Y, Zhu H, Derksen R, Ozkan E, Krause C. Evaluation of ultrasonic sensor for variable-rate spray applications. Comput. Electron. Agric., 2011; 75(1): 213–221.

Li L, Li H, He X K, Andreas H. Development and experiment of automatic detection device for infrared target. Transaction of the CSAE, 2012; 28(12): 159–163. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Holterman H J, vande Zande J C, Porskamp H A J, Huijsmans J F M. Modelling spray drift from boom sprayers. Comput. Electron. Agric., 1997; 19(1): 1–22.

Miller P C H, Butler Ellis, M.C. Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers. Crop Prot., 2000; 19(8): 609–615.

Delele M A, De Moor A, Sonck B, Ramon H, Nicolai B M, Verboven P. Modelling and validation of the air flow generated by a cross flow air sprayer as affected by travel speed and fan speed. Biosyst. Eng., 2005; 92(2): 165–174.

Dai F F. Selection and calculation of the blowing rate of air-assisted sprayers. Plant Prot., 2008; 34(6): 124–127. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Qiu W. Ding W W, Wang X. C, Gong Y, Zhang X X, Lv X L. 3WZ-700 self-propelled air-blowing orchard sprayer. Transaction of the CSAE, 2012; 43(4): 26–30, 44. (in Chinese with English abstract)

ISO, International Organization for Standardization. ISO 22866: 2005. Equipment for Crop Protection- Methods for field measurement of spray drift. Geneva, Switzerland.

Fox R D, Brazee R D, Svensson S A, Reichard D L. Air jet velocities from a cross-flow fan sprayer. T. ASAE, 1992; 35(5): 1381–1384.

Svensson S A, Brazee R D, Fox RD, Williams K A. Air jet velocities in and beyond apple trees from a tow-fan cross-flow sprayer. Trans. ASAE, 2003; 46(2): 611–621.

Song S R, Hong T S, Sun D Z, Zhu Y Q, Luo C Y. Effect of fan power supply frequency on deposition of air-assisted sprayer. Transaction of the CSAE, 2011; 27(1): 153–159. (in Chinese with English abstract)

He X K, Yan K R, Chu J Y, Wang J, Zeng A J. Design and testing of the automatic target detecting, electrostatic, air assisted, orchard sprayer. Transaction of the CSAE, 2003; 19(6): 78–80. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Brown D L, Giles D K, Oliver M N, Klassend P. Targeted spray technology to reduce pesticide in runoff from dormant orchards. Crop Prot., 2008; 27(3-5): 545–552.

Derksen R C, Gray R L. Deposition and air speed patterns of air-carrier apple orchard sprayers. Trans. ASAE, 1995; 38(1): 5–11.

Cross J V, Walklate P J, Murray R A, Richardson G M. Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 2. Effects of spray quality. Crop Prot., 2001; 20(4): 333–343.

Walklate P J, Cross J V. Regulated dose adjustment of commercial orchard spraying products. Crop Prot. 2013; 54(12): 65–73.

Walklate P J, Cross J V, Pergher G. Support system for efficient dosage of orchard and vineyard spraying products. Comput. Electron. Agri., 2011; 75(2): 355–362.

Cross J V, Walklate P J, Murray R A, Richardson G M. Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 3. Effects of air volumetric flow rate. Crop Prot., 2003; 22(2): 381–394.

Randall J M. The relationships between air volume and pressure on spray distribution in fruit trees. J. agric. Eng. Res., 1971; 16(1): 1–31.

Giles D K. Independent control of liquid flow rate and spray droplet size from hydraulic atomizers. Atomization & Sprays, 1997; 7(2): 161–181.

Sidahmed M M, Brown R B. Simulation of spray dispersal and deposition from a forestry air blast sprayer – Part 1: Air jet model. T. ASAE, 2001; 44(1): 5–10.




Copyright (c)



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office