Design and test of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) electrostatic spraying system for crop protection

Zhang Yanliang, Lian Qi, Zhang Wei

Abstract


In recent years, multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) crop protection operations have experienced tremendous growth. Compared with manual operations, they have advantages such as high operational efficiency, small pesticide dosage, and low pesticide hazards for humans. However, the tiny droplets produced during UAV spraying for crop protection are affected by the rotor air flow and will drift in all directions in an uncontrollable manner, severely affecting the pesticide deposition pattern and resulting in pesticide waste. To improve pesticide use efficiency during multi-rotor UAV spraying, an electrostatic spray system was designed based on electrostatic spray technology and a six-rotor UAV. The proper operation parameters for the UAV electrostatic spray were determined by test, which were spray altitude of 50 cm above the crop, spray pressure of 0.3 MPa and charging voltage of 9 kV. Field test was performed based on these parameters. The results showed that compared with non-electrostatic spray, the electrostatic spray improved by 13.6% in the average deposition density above the sampling device and 32.6% in the middle. The research can provide a reference for designing multi-rotor UAV electrostatic spray devices.
Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), multi-rotor, electrostatic spraying, pesticide use efficiency, plant protection
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20171006.3460

Citation: Zhang Y L, Lian Q, Zhang W. Design and test of a six-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) electrostatic spraying system for crop protection. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(6): 68–76.

Keywords


unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), multi-rotor, electrostatic spraying, pesticide use efficiency, plant protection

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berk P, Hocevar M, Stajnko D, Belsak A. Development of alternative plant protection product application techniques in orchards, based on measurement sensing systems: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2016; 124: 273–288.

Yang X J., Yan H R, Xu S Z. Current situation and development trend of equipment for crop protection. Transactions of the CSAM, 2002; 33(6): 130–137. (in Chinese)

Lan Y B, Chen S D, Fritz B K. Current status and future trends of precision agricultural aviation technologies. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(3): 1–17.

He X K, Bonds J, Herbst A, Langenakens J. Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle for plant protection in East Asia. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(3): 18–30.

Liu Y F, Noguchi N, Ali R F. Simulation and test of an agricultural unmanned airboat maneuverability model. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(1): 88–96.

Xue X Y, Lan Y B. Agricultural aviation applications in USA. Transactions of the CSAM, 2013; 44(5): 194–201. (in Chinese)

Salyani M, Cromwell R P. Spray drift from ground and aerial applications. Transactions of the ASABE, 1992; 35(4): 1113–1120.

Nuyttens D, de Schampheleire M, Baetens K, Sonck B. The influence of operator-controlled variables on spray drift from field crop sprayers. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007; 50(4): 1129–1140.

Otto S, Loddo D, Baldoin C, Zanin G. Spray drift reduction techniques for vineyards in fragmented landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015; 162(2): 290–298.

Gil E, Balsari P, Gallart M, Llorensc J, Marucco P, Andersen P G, et al. Determination of drift potential of different flat fan nozzles on a boom sprayer using a test bench. Crop Protection, 2014; 56(2): 58–68.

Li J Y, Lan Y B, Zhou Z Y, Zeng S, Huang C, Yao W X, et al. Design and test of operation parameters for rice air broadcasting by unmanned aerial vehicle. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9(5): 24–32.

Bae Y, Koo Y M. Flight attitudes and spray patterns of a roll-balanced agricultural unmanned helicopter. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2013; 29(5): 675–682.

Gao Y Y, Zhang Y T, Zhao Y C. Primary studies on spray driplet distribution and control effects of aerial spraying using unmanned vehicle (UAV) against the corn borer. Plant Protection, 2013; 39(2): 152–157. (in Chinese)

Gao Y Y. Study on distribution of pesticide droplets in gramineous crop canopy and control effect sprayed by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)

Qin W C, Xue X Y, Zhou L X. Effects of spraying parameters of unmanned aerial vehicle on droplets deposition distribution of maize canopies. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(5): 50–56. (in Chinese)

Carlton J B. Technique to reduce chemical usage and concomitant drift from aerial sprays: US Patent. 1999.

Hu Y G, Liu S Z, Wu W Y, Wang J Z, Shen J W. Optimal flight parameters of unmanned helicopter for tea plantation frost protection. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2015; 8(5): 50–57.

Zhang W, Hou Y R, Liu X, Lian Q, Fu X M, Zhang B, et al. Wind tunnel experimental study on droplet drift reduction by a conical electrostatic nozzle for pesticide spraying. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(3): 87-94.

Qiu B J, Wang L W, Cai D L, Wu J H. Effects of flight altitude and speed of unmanned helicopter on spray deposition uniform. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(24): 25–32. (in Chinese)

Hewitt A J, Maber J, Praat J P. Drift management using modeling and GIS systems. Proceedings of the World Congress of Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2002; pp.290–296.

Teske M E, Thistle H W. Aerial application model extension into the far field. ASAE Annual Meeting, 2003; Paper No. 034019.

He X K, Zeng A J, Liu Y J, Song J L. Precision orchard sprayer based on automatically infrared target detecting and electrostatic spraying techniques. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2011; 4(1): 35–40.

Kirk I W, Hoffmann W C, Carlton J B. Aerial electrostatic spray system performance. Transactions of the ASAE, 2001; 44(5): 1089–1092.

Carlton J B, Isler D A. Development of a device to charge aerial sprays electrostatically. Agricultural Aviation, 1966; 8(2): 44–51.

Ru Y, Jin L, Jia Z C, Bao R, Qian X D. Design and experiment on electrostatic spraying system for unmanned aerial vehicle. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015; 31(8): 42–47. (in Chinese)

Liu Q, Qi L J, Fu Z T, Wang J, Cooper S E. Experimental research on droplet travel time and deposition characteristic from sprayer. Transactions of the CSAM, 2007; 38(6): 62–65. (in Chinese)

Jiang Y, Chen C, Li H, Xiang Q J. Influences of nozzle parameters and low-pressure on jet breakup and droplet characteristics. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9(4): 22–32.




Copyright (c)



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office