Systematic comparison of hydrogen production from fossil fuels and biomass resources

Kang Peng, Gary Morrow, Zhang Xiaolei, Wang Tipeng, Zhongfu Tan, Jayant Agarwal

Abstract


Fossil fuels are the main energy source to satisfy the worldwide energy demands. However, the energy demands are increasing and the supply of fossil fuels is decreasing, thus many countries are looking for other fuel sources. Differing from the traditional fuels, hydrogen is considered as one of the most promising energy sources due to its intrinsic features such as clean, efficient, safe and sustainable. Developing novel technologies for hydrogen production from renewable sources (such as biomass) becomes a core area for the investigation of hydrogen industry. Within this work, different pathways for hydrogen production including steam reforming, electrolysis, and biomass gasification have been systematically compared in terms of yield and cost. This comparison is unique since the systematic evaluation was conducted from many aspects for all the hydrogen production pathways, especially those by involving the biomass gasification that still lack of available literatures. The assessment methods involved energy analysis, exergy analysis and economic analysis. It was concluded that steam reforming remains the cheapest method of hydrogen production at 1.748 $/kg, however, steam reforming is not an ideal process currently or for the future, gasification and electrolysis remains competitive with high yield but requires relatively high initial and annual expenditure. For biomass gasification, though its energy efficiency is lower than steam reforming, it has relatively higher mass yield, demonstrating the feasibility of this process for hydrogen production. Further for biomass gasification, the selection of correct feedstock is a key to maximize its yield, i.e. a yield of 82.47% is possible with corn stover fed gasification.
Keywords: hydrogen production, biomass feedstock, gasification, pyrolysis, fossil fuel, techno-economic assessment, exergy
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20171006.2990

Citation: Kang P, Morrow G, Zhang X L, Wang T P, Tan Z F, Agarwal J. Systematic comparison of hydrogen production from fossil fuels and biomass resources. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(6): 192–200.

Keywords


hydrogen production, biomass feedstock, gasification, pyrolysis, fossil fuel, techno-economic assessment, exergy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hosseini S E, Wahid M A, Jamil M M, Azli A A M. A review on biomass-based hydrogen production for renewable energy supply. International Journal of Energy Research, 2015; 39(12): 1597–1615.

Roger G G. How much hydrogen is produced in the United States. Eco Global Fuels, 2015. Available: http://ecoglobalfuels.com/news/how-much-hydrogen-produced-united-states. Accessed on [2015-09-10].

Aghamohammadi N, Reginald S S, Shamiri A, Zinatizadeh A A, Li P W, Sulaiman N M B N. An investigation of sustainable power generation from oil palm biomass: a case study in Sarawak. Sustainability-Basel, 2016; 8(5): 416–418.

Hawa B, Elif K. Hydrogen from biomass- Present scenario and future prospects. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010; 35(14): 7416–7426.

Trevor L L, Anthony R R, Maohong F. The progress in water gas shift and steam reforming hydrogen production technologies-a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014; 39(30): 16983–17000.

Trevor L L, Anthony R R, Maohong F. Development of catalysts for hydrogen production through the integration of steam reforming of methane and high temperature water gas shift. Energy, 2015; 90(1): 748–758.

Li Y M, Fu P, Yi W M, Bai X Y. Hydrogen production by steam reforming of acetic acid and bio-oil using Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2015; 8(6): 69–76.

Demirbas A, Arin G. An overview of biomass pyrolysis. Energy Sources, 2002; 24(5): 471–485.

Evans R J, Chornet E, Czernik S, Feik C, French R, Phillips S, et al. Renewable hydrogen production by catalytic steam reforming of peanut shells pyrolysis products. Acs Fuel Chem, 2002; 47(2): 757–758.

Padró C E G. The road to the hydrogen future: Research & development in the hydrogen program. Acs Fuel Chem, 1998; 43(3): 353–357.

Jalana R K, Srivastavaa V K. Studies on pyrolysis of a single biomass cylindrical pellet-kinetic and heat transfer effects. Energy Conversion and Management, 1999; 40(5): 467–494.

Prakash P, Sheeba N. Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield-A review. Renewable Energy, 2014; 66: 570–579.

Dermirbas A. Hydrogen production from biomass by the gasification process. Energy Sources, 2002; 24(1): 59–68.

[14] Butterman H C, Castaldi M J. CO2 as a carbon neutral fuel source via enhanced biomass gasification. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009; 43(23): 9030–9032.

Lau F S, Bowen D A, Dihu R, Doong S, Hughes E E, Remick R, et al. Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production by gasification of biomass. Gas Technology Institute, 2002. Available: https://www.osti. gov/scitech/biblio/816024. Accessed on [2016-09-12].

Kenia G D S, Caroline T E, Eduardo D R, Reinaldo A B, Elisandro P F, Cleber A L, et al. Hydrogen production in the electrolysis of water in Brazil, a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017; 68(1): 563–571.

Nicoletta P, Fabrizio B, Alessandro T. A two-tier approach to the optimization of a biomass supply chain for pyrolysis processes. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2016; 84: 87–97.

Tanger P, Field J L, Jahn C E, DeFoort M W, Leach J E.

Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2013; 4(11): 218–218.

Gielen D, Moriguchi Y. CO in the iron and steel industry: an analysis of Japanese emission reduction potentials. Energy Policy, 2002; 30(10): 849–863.

Wu Y S, Yang W H, Blasiak W. Energy and exergy analysis of high temperature agent gasification of biomass. Energies, 2014; 7(4): 2107–2122.

French R, Bair K M, Czernik S, Parent Y, Ritland M, Chornet E. Fluidizable catalysts for hydrogen production hydrogen from steam reforming biomass pyrolysis products. Acs Fuel Chem, 2002; 47(2): 759–760.

Acomb J C, Wu C, Williams P T. The use of different metal catalysts for the simultaneous production of carbon nanotubes and hydrogen from pyrolysis of plastic feedstocks.

Applied Catalysis b-Environmental, 2016; 180: 497–510.

Wilckens R S, Linnemann J, Trumper S. Cost models for current and future hydrogen production. Research gate, 2007. Available: https://www.ika.rwth-aachen.de/r2h/images/ d/d6/ Roads2HyCom_R2H2020PU_-_H2_Production_Cost_ Models.pdf. Accessed on [2015-11-12].

Milne T A, Evans R J, Abatzaglou N. Biomass gasifier“tars”: Their nature, formation, and conversion. Nrel, 1998. Available: http://www.ps-survival.com/PS/ Gasifiers/Biomass_Gasifier_ Tars_Their_Nature_Formation_ And_Conversion_1998.pdf. Accessed on [2015-06-12].

James H. Flows of biomass to and from the EU-an analysis of data and trends. Fern, 2011. Available: http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/Biomass%20imports%20to%20the%20EU%20 final_0.pdf. Accessed on [2016-08-21].




Copyright (c)



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office