Climate change impacts on streamflow, water quality, and best management practices for the Shell and Logan Creek Watersheds in Nebraska, USA

Michael W. Van Liew, S. Feng, T. B. Pathak


Abstract: Improvements in the management of water, sediment, and nutrients under future climatic conditions are needed to ensure increased crop and livestock production to meet greater global needs and the future availability of water for competing demands and protection against adverse water quality impairments. This study determined the impacts of future climate change scenarios on streamflow, water quality, and best management practices (BMPs) for two watersheds in Nebraska, USA. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was employed to simulate streamflow, sediment, total nitrogen (N) and total phosphorus (P) from the Shell Creek Watershed near Columbus, Nebraska and the Logan Creek Watershed near Sioux City, Iowa. Available streamflow and water quality records for the two watersheds were used to calibrate model parameters that govern streamflow, sediment, and nutrient responses in SWAT. For each watershed, precipitation, air temperature, and CO2 concentrations were input to SWAT for four climatic conditions: a baseline condition for the 1980 to 2000 period and the SRES A2, A1B, and B1 climate scenarios for a future period from 2040 to 2059. Findings from this study suggest that under the three future climate change scenarios, sediment losses are expected to be about 1.2 to 1.5 times greater than the baseline condition for Shell Creek and 2 to 2.5 times greater for Logan Creek; total N losses are expected to be about 1.2 to 1.4 times greater for Shell Creek and 1.7 to 1.9 times greater for Logan Creek. Relative to the baseline, total P losses under the future climate scenarios are projected to be about the same for Shell Creek and 1.5 to 1.7 times greater for Logan Creek. Findings from this study also suggest that future projected increases in both precipitation and CO2 concentration account for net increases in streamflow, but in different ways on each watershed.
Keywords: hydrology, water quality, model calibration, climate change, SWAT
DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20120501.003
Citation: Van Liew M W, Feng S, Pathak T B. Climate change impacts on streamflow, water quality, and best management practices for the Shell and Logan Creek Watersheds in Nebraska, USA. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2012; 5(1): 13


hydrology; water quality; model calibration; climate change; SWAT


Tomer M D, Schilling K E. A simple approach to

distinguish land-use and climate-change effects on watershed

hydrology. J Environ Qual, 2009; 376: 24-33.

Hurd B H, Callaway M, Smith J, Kirshen P. Climatic

change and US water resources: from modeled watershed

impacts to national estimates. J Am Water Resour Assoc,

; 40(1): 129-148.

Gleick P H, Chalecki E L. The impacts of climatic changes

for water resources of the Colorado and Sacramento-San

Joaquin River Basins. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 1999;

(6): 1429-1441.

Murdoch P S, Baron J S, Miller T L. Potential effects of

climate change on surface-water quality in North America. J

Am Water Resour Assoc, 2000; 36(2): 347-366.

Hauser R, Archer S, Backlund P, Hatfield J, Janetos A,

Lettenmaier D, et al. The effects of climate change on U.S.

Ecosystems. U.S. Global Change Research Program.

Karl T R, Melillo J M, Peterson T C. Global climate change

impacts in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Global

Change Research Program. 2009. Available at:


Jha M, Arnold J G, Gassman P W, Giorgi F, Gu R R .

Climate change sensitivity assessment on Upper Mississippi

River Basin streamflows using SWAT. J Am Water Resour

Assoc, 2006; 42(4): 997-1016.

Mehta V M, Rosenberg N J,Mendoza K. Simulated impacts of

three decadal climate variability phenomena on water yields in

the Missouri River Basin. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 2011;

(1): 126–135. Doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010. 00496.x.

Stone M C, Hotchkiss R C, Mearnes L O. Water yield

responses to high and low spatial resolution climate change

scenarios in the Missouri River Basin. Geophys Res Lett,

; 30(4), 1186. Doi:10.1029/2220GLO16122.

Takle E S, Jha M, Lu E, Arritt R W, Gutowski W J, the

NARCCAP Team . Streamflow in the upper Mississippi river

basin as simulated by SWAT driven by 20th Century

contemporary results of global climate models and

NARCCAP regional climate models. Meteorologische

Zeitschrift, 19(4): 341-346. Doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2010/

Woznicki S A, Nejadhashemi A P. Sensitivity analysis of

best management practices under climate change scenarios. J

Am Water Resour Assoc, 2011; 1-23. Doi:


Woznicki S A, Nejadhashemi A P, Smith C M. Assessing

best management practice implementation strategies under

climate change scenarios. Trans ASABE, 2011; 54(1):


Lioubimtseva E, Cole R, Adams J M, Kapustin G . Impacts

of climate and land-cover changes in arid lands of Central

Asia. J Arid Environ, 2005; 62(2): 285-308.

Tollan A. Land use change and floods: what do we need

most research or management? Water Sci Technol, 2002;

: 183-190.

Jackson R B, Carpenter S R, Dahm C N, McKnight D M,

Naiman R J, Postel S L, et al. Water in a changing world.

Ecol Appl, 2001; 11(4): 1027-1045.

Marshall, E, Randhir, T. Effect of climate change on

watershed system: a regional analysis. Climate Change,

; 89(3-4): 263-280.

Wilby R L, Orr H G, Hedger M, Forrow D, Blackmore M.

Risks posed by climate change to the delivery of water

framework Directive objectives in the UK. Environ Int,

; 32(8): 1043-1055.

Chen C W, Herr J W, Goldstein R A, Ice G, Cundy T.

Retrospective comparison of watershed analysis risk

March, 2012 Climate change impacts on streamflow, water quality, and BMP for the shell and logan creek watersheds Vol. 5 No.1 33

management framework and hydrologic simulation program

fortran applications to Mica Creek watershed. J Environ

Eng, ASCE, 2005; Vol. 131(9): 1277-1284.

Goldstein R A. Watershed analysis risk management

framework (WARMF): Update One. Topical Report. EPRI,

Palo Alto, CA, 2001. Available at: http://www2.bren.

Accessed on [2012-02-08]

Goncu S, Albek E. Modeling climate change effects on

streams and reservoirs with HSPF. Water Resour Manag,

; 24:707-726.

Jacomino V M F, Fields D E. A critical approach to the

calibration of a watershed model. J Am Water Resour

Assoc, 1997; 33(1): 143–154.

Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, Williams J R.

Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I.

Model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 1998; 34(1):


Gassman P W, Reyes M R, Green C H, Amold J G. The Soil

and Water Assessment Tool: historical development,

applications, and future research directions. Trans ASABE,

; 50(4): 1211-1250.

Fan J, Tian F, Yang Y, Han S, Qiu G. Quantifying the

magnitude of the impact of climate change and human

activity on runoff decline in Mian River Basin, China. Water

Sci Technol, 2010; 62(4): 783-791.

Fricklin D L, Luo Y, Luedeling E, Gatzke S E, Zhang M.

Sensitivity of agricultural runoff loads to rising levels of CO2

and climate change in the San Joaquin Valley of California.

Environ Pollut, 2010; 158: 223-234.

Githui F, Gitau W, Mutua F, Bauwens W. Climate change

impact on SWAT simulated streamflow in western Kenya. Int

J Clim, 2009; 29: 1823-1834.

Park M J, Park J Y, Shin H J, Lee M S, Park G A, Jung I K,

Kim S J. Projection of future climate change impacts on

nonpoint source pollution loads for a forest dominant dam

watershed by reflecting future vegetation canopy in a Soil

and Water Assessment Tool model. Water Sci Technol,

; 61(8): 1975-1986.

Singh A, Gosain A K. Climate-change impact assessment

using GIS-based hydrological modeling. Water Int, 2011;

Vol. 36(3): 386-397.

Somura H, Takeda I, Mori Y. Sensitivity analyses of

hydrologic and suspended sediment discharge in the Abashiri

River basin, Hokkaido region, Japan. Int Agric Eng J,

;18(1-2): 27-39.

Li Z, Liu W Z, Zhang X C, Zheng F L. Assessing and

regulating the impacts of climate change on water resources

in the Heihe watershed on the Loess Plateau of China. Sci

China Earth Sci, 2010; 53(5): 710-720.

Arnold J G, Allen P M. Estimating hydrologic budgets for

three Illinois watersheds. J Hydrol, 1996; 176, 57–77.

Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, Allen P M.

Continental scale simulation of the hydrologic balance. J Am

Water Resour Assoc, 1999; 35(5): 1037-1052.

USDA-NRCS. Chapter 10: Estimation of direct runoff from

storm rainfall. In NRCS National Engineering Handbook, Part

: Hydrology. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2004.


hid=21422. Accessed on [2012-02-08].

Monteith J L. Evaporation and the environment. In: The

State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms. XIXt

Symposium, Soc. for Exp. Biol., Swansea, Cambridge

University Press, 1965; pp 205-234.

Neitsch S L, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, Williams J R. Soil and

water assessment tool theoretical documentation version

Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report

No. 406. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 2011.

Available at:

Accessed on [2012-02-08].

Williams J R. Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds.

Water Resour Bull, 1975; 11(5): 965-974.

Laflen J M, Moldenhauer W C. Pioneering soil erosion

prediction: The USLE Story. Special Publication No. 1

Beijing, China: World Association of Soil and Water

Conservation. 2003. Available:

book_for_web.pdf. Accessed on [2012-02-07].

Brown L C, Barnwell T O. The enhanced water quality

models: QUAL2E and QAL2E_UNCAS documentation and

user manual. EPA/600/3-87/007. Athens, GA: U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency . 1987.

USGS. National Elevation Dataset. Reston, Virginia: U.S.

Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior. 2006.

Available: Accessed on [2012-02-07].

USGS. National Land Cover Database 2001 (NLCD2001).

Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department

of the Interior. 2011. Available:

nlcd2001.php. Accessed on [2012-02-07].

USDA-NRCS. State Soil Geographic (STATSG0) Data Base:

Data use information. Publication Number 1492. Lincoln,

Nebraska: National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources

Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1994.

Available at:

statsgo_db.pdf. Accessed on [2012-02-07].

SWAT. ArcSWAT: ArcGIS-ArcView extension and

graphical user input interface for SWAT. College Station,

Texas: Spatial Sciences Laboratory, Texas A&M University.

Available at:

March, 2012 Int J Agric & Biol Eng Open Access at Vol. 5 No.1

Accessed on [2012-02-07].

NCDC. NNDC Climate Data Online. Asheville, North

Carolina: U.S. National Climate Data Center, 2012. Available

at: Accessed on


USGS. USGS Surface-Water Data for the Nation. Reston,

Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the

Interior, 2012. Available at:

sw. Accessed on [2011-01-15].

Shrestha R R, Dibike Y B, Prowse T D. Modeling of

climate-induced hydrologic changes in the Lake Winnipeg

Watershed. J. Great Lakes Res, 2011; DOI:


Zhang H, Huang G H, Wang D, Zhang X. Uncertainty

assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology of

small prairie watersheds, 2011; J. of Hydrology.


Meehl G A, Covey C, Delworth T, Latif M, Bryant M,

Michell J F B. The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: A

new era in climate change research, Bull Amer Meteorol Soc,

; 88, 1383–1394.

Maurer E P, Adam J C, Wood A W. Climate model based

consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the

Rio Lempa basin of Central America, Hydrol Earth System

Sci, 2009; 13, 183–194.

Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, Vries B, Fenhann J,

Gaffin S, et al. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A

Special Report of Working Group III of the

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge

University Press, Cambridge, U.K.,

Full Text: Provisional-PDF PDF

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.