In-chamber thermocatalytic tar cracking and syngas reforming using char-supported NiO catalyst in an updraft biomass gasifier

Arthur M. James R, Wenqiao Yuan, Michael D. Boyette, Donghai Wang, Ajay Kumar

Abstract


Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of an in-chamber tar cracking and syngas reforming unit. This unit was composed of a two-stage tubular reactor placed within the combustion zone of an updraft biomass gasifier. Heat generated in the exothermic combustion reactions of biomass gasification drove tar cracking and syngas reforming in the tubes, eliminating the need of external heating. The performance of the unit was evaluated using char-supported NiO catalysts and was found to be very effective in tar removal and syngas composition enhancement. A tar removal rate of 95% was achieved at 0.3 s residence time and 10% nickel loading. This condition also gave syngas high-heating value increment of 36% (to 7.3 MJ/m3). The effect of gas residence time and Ni loading on tar removal and syngas composition of the unit was also studied. Gas residence of 0.2-0.3 s and Ni loading of 5%-10% were found appropriate to produce clean syngas with tar content appropriate for industrial applications (smaller than 0.6 g/m3) in an updraft biomass gasifier without external heating.
Keywords: biomass gasification, tar cracking, syngas reforming, nickel catalyst, char catalyst
DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20140706.011

Citation: James A, Yuan W, Boyette M D, Wang D, Kumar A. In-chamber thermocatalytic tar cracking and syngas reforming using char-supported NiO catalyst in an updraft biomass gasifier. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2014; 7(6): 91－97.

Keywords


biomass gasification, tar cracking, syngas reforming, nickel catalyst, char catalyst

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mathieu P, Dubuisson R. Performance analysis of a biomass gasifier. Energy Conversion and Management, 2002; 43: 1291–1299.

Hasan J, Keshwani D R, Carterand S F, Treasure T H. Chapter 10: Thermochemical conversion of biomass to power and fuels. In: Cheng J, editor. Biomass to Renewable Energy Processes. Florida: Taylor & Francis Group, 2010; pp. 437–489.

Knoef H. Practical aspects of biomass gasification. In: Knoef H, editor. Handbook of biomass gasification. 2005; pp. 13–37.

Dry M E. The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950-2000. Catalysis Today, 2002; 71(3): 227–241.

Milne T, Evans R, Abatzoglou N. Biomass gasifier “Tars”: Their nature, formation, and conversion. NREL/TP-570- 25357. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1998.

Jansen J C, Jönsson K, Hagman M. Biological detoxification of tar-water. Water Sci. Technol., 2002; 46(4-5): 59–65.

Nair S A, Pemen A J M, Yan K, Van HeeschE J M, Ptasinski K J, Drinkenburg A A H. Chemical processes in tar removal from biomass derived fuel gas by pulsed corona discharge. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2003; 23(4): 665–680.

Yan Q, Yu F, Liu J, Street J, Gao J, Cai Z, Zhang J. Catalytic conversion wood syngas to synthetic aviation turbine fuels over a multifunctional catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 2013; 127: 281–290.

Huber G W, Dumesic J A. An overview of aqueous-phase catalytic processes for production of hydrogen and alkanes in a biorefinery. Catalyst Today, 2006; 111(1–2): 119–132.

Yang X, Xu S, Xu H, Liu X, Liu C. Nickel supported on modified olivine catalyst for steam reforming of gasification tar. Catalyst Communications, 2010; 11: 383–386.

Zhang R, Wang Y, Brown R C. Steam reforming of tar compounds over Ni/olivine catalyst doped with CeO2. Energy Conversion and Management, 2007; 48: 67–77.

Wang D, Yuan W, Ji W. Use of hydrothermal conversion char as the Ni catalyst in benzene and gasification tar removal. Transactions of the ASABE, 2010; 53(3): 795–800.

Wang, D, Yuan W, Ji W. Char and char-supported nickel catalyst for secondary syngas cleanup and conditioning. Applied Energy, 2011; 88: 1656–1663.

Basu P. Tar production and destruction. Biomass gasification and pyrolysis: practical design and theory. Burlington, MA, U.S., Elsevier Inc., 2010.

Wang T, Chang J, Lü P, Zhu J. Novel catalyst for cracking of biomass tar. Energy & Fuels, 2005; 19: 22–27.

Dayton D A. Review of the literature on catalytic biomass tar destruction. NREL/TP-510-32815. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Catalyst Today, 2002; 71: 227–241.

Wang D, Yuan W, Ji W. Effective syngas cleanup and reforming using Ni/γ-Al2O3. Int. J. Agric. & Biol. Eng., 2010; 3(2): 39–45.

Geyer W A, Walawender W P. Biomass properties and gasification behaviour of young silver maple trees. Wood and Fiber Science, 1997; 29(1): 85–90.

Annamalai K, Puri I K, Jog M A. Advanced thermodynamics engineering. CRC Press, 2001; p. 519.

Wang D. Study of Ni/char catalyst for biomass gasification in an updraft gasifier: Influence of catalyst granular size on catalytic performance. BioResources, 2013; 8(3): 3479–3489.

Shen Y F, Zhao P T, Shao Q F, Ma D C, Takahashi F,

Yoshikawa K. In-situ catalytic conversion of tar using rice husk char-supported nickel-iron catalysts for biomass pyrolysis/gasification. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014; 152–153: 140–151.

Park H J, Park S H, Sohn J M, Park J, Jeon J, Kim S, et al. Steam reforming of biomass gasification tar using benzene as a model compound over various Ni supported metal oxide catalysts. Bioresour. Technol., 2010; 101(1, Supplement): S101–S103.

Khodakov A Y, Chu W, Fongarland P. Advances in the development of novel cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts for synthesis of long-chain hydrocarbons and clean fuels.

Chemical Reviews, 2007; 107(5): 1692–1744.

He M, Xiao B, Hu Z, Liu S, Guo X, Luo S. Syngas production from catalytic gasification of waste polyethylene: Influence of temperature on gas yield and composition. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009; 34(3): 1342–1348.

Gao J, Wang Y, Ping Y, Hu D, Xu G, Gu F, et al. A thermodynamic analysis of methanation reactions of carbon oxides for the production of synthetic natural gas. RSC Advances, 2012; 2(6): 2358–2368.

Abu El-Rub Z, Bramer E A, Brem G. Experimental comparison of biomass chars with other catalysts for tar reduction. Fuel, 2008; 87 (10-11): 2243–2252.




Copyright (c)



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office